Pecan tree named ‘Ga. 03-6-32’

ABSTRACT

A pecan tree distinguished by the following unique combination of characteristics: large nut size, bright kernel color, good shelling ability, moderately early harvest date, and good resistance to the scab fungus (Venturia effuse) in sprayed orchards.

Botanical designation: Carya illinoinensis.

Cultivar denomination: ‘Ga. 03-6-32’.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to a new and distinct cultivar of Carya,botanically know as Carya illinoinensis, and hereinafter referred to bythe cultivar name ‘Ga. 03-6-32’.

The new Carya illinoinensis ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ is a product of a plannedbreeding program conducted by the inventor in Tifton, Ga. In 2003 thecross 03-6 (‘Sioux’ x ‘Desirable’) was made by Patrick Conner at ahorticulture farm in Tifton, Ga. ‘Sioux’ (unpatented) is a 1962 USDArelease which is notable for its light kernel color, excellent shellingability, and vigorous growth. ‘Sioux’ was at one time recommended forplanting in Georgia, but large plantings were not made because nut sizeis too small (6.2 g) to bring maximum prices. ‘Desirable’ (unpatented)was the most planted pecan cultivar in Georgia for several decades.Attractive traits of ‘Desirable’ are large nut size, consistent bearing,light kernel color, and excellent shelling ability into complete halves.Unfortunately, ‘Desirable’ has become extremely susceptible to pecanscab disease, caused by the fungus Venturia effuse, and is therefore nolonger recommended for planting in southern Georgia where scab is moreprevalent. Cross 03-6 produced 205 nuts, from which 124 seedlings weretransplanted into a seedling orchard after growing the seedlings in potsfor one year and removing those with symptoms of pecan scab on thefoliage. Seedlings were transplanted into the seedling orchard in 2005on the Tifton Campus. ‘Ga 03-6-32’ first fruited in 2008, when it wasselected for its large size (10.2 g) and high percent kernel (60%). ‘Ga.03-6-32’ was selected for yield trials in 2009.

Asexual reproduction of ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ was performed by grafting (topworking) onto ‘Newt’ (unpatented) pecan trees in 2009 at Tifton, Ga.,and whip grafting pecan seedlings at Ray City, Ga., and Albany, Ga. wasperformed in order to evaluate these trees. Continued asexualreproduction of ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ has shown that the unique features of thenew ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ reproduced true to form, are firmly fixed, and areestablished and transmitted through succeeding propagations.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The new pecan tree ‘Ga.03-6-32’ has not been observed under all possibleenvironmental conditions. Certain phenotypical characteristics of thisvariety, such as growth and color, may vary with changing environmentalconditions and cultural practices such as temperature, water andfertility levels, soil types, nutrient availability and light intensitywithout, however, any variance in genotype.

‘Ga.03-6-32’ is distinguished from other pecan varieties known to theinventor due to the following unique combination of characteristics:large nut size, bright kernel color, good shelling ability, moderatelyearly harvest date, and good resistance to the scab fungus in sprayedorchards. These traits have been repeatedly observed and are determinedto be the unique and distinguishing characteristics of the new Caryaillinoinensis ‘Ga. 03-6-32’. Pecan trees of the new ‘Ga.03-6-32’ differfrom the parent ‘Sioux’ at least by having larger average nut size anddiffer from parent ‘Desirable’ at least by better resistance to pecanscab disease. Differences from other pecan cultivars are presented inthe tables below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The accompanying colored photographic illustrations show the overallappearance and distinct characteristics of the new cultivar of Caryaillinoinensis ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ showing the colors as true as possible.Colors in the photographs may differ slightly from the color valuescited in the detailed botanical description, which accurately describesthe colors of the new Genus species ‘cultivar name’. The data in FIG. 1was based on data collected from four grafted trees on their firstthrough eleventh year from top-working grafts. FIGS. 2, 3 and 4 are fromthe 15-year-old original tree in Tifton, Ga.

FIG. 1 is a pollination chart showing the timing of pollen shed andstigma receptivity of ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ in comparison to several other pecancultivars grown in Tifton, Ga.

FIG. 2 is a photograph showing the form and color of the stigma of ‘Ga.03-6-32’.

FIG. 3 is a photograph showing the nut and kernel of ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ nuts.

FIG. 4 is a photograph showing nut shape and kernel characteristics of‘Ga. 03-6-32’ (center) in comparison to parent cultivars ‘Desirable’(top) and ‘Stuart’ (bottom).

FIG. 5 is a photograph showing the form of an 11-year-old tree of ‘Ga.03-6-32’ grown in Tifton, Ga.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Botanical:

The following detailed description of ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ is based onobservations of the original tree growing in Tifton, Ga. at ages 15 and16 and of asexually reproduced progeny on their first through eleventhyears from top-working grafts, growing in Tifton, Ga., and whip graftedtrees on their first through eighth year in Ray City and Albany, Ga.

Throughout this specification, color names beginning with a small lettersignify that the name of that color, as used in common speech, is aptlydescriptive. Color names beginning with a capital letter designatevalues based made with reference to The Royal Horticultural Society(R.H.S.) Colour Chart, 2005. The color characteristics of this type mayvary with lighting and other conditions. Therefore, colorcharacteristics of this new variety should be determined with referenceto the observations described herein, rather than from theseillustrations alone.

-   Varietal Name: ‘Ga. 03-6-32’.-   Parentage: Seed parent: ‘Sioux’; Pollen parent: ‘Desirable’.-   Description of plant material:    -   -   Tree.—‘Ga. 03-6-32’ trees are vigorous with an upright            moderately spreading canopy. Trunks have tight scales greyed            green in color (RHS N200C). The ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ trees have a            dense branching pattern. In 2018 the height of the original,            15-year-old ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ tree was about 14 meters in height            and had a canopy width of about 10.7 meters. In 2022, the            heigh of an 11-year-old ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ tree, shown in FIG. 5            , was about 9.9 meters in height with a canopy width of            about 7.7 meters.        -   Leaf.—The mature leaf is odd pinnate compound. Leaves are            dark green (RHS 137A) on the adaxial side and lighter in            color on the abaxial side (RHS 147B). Each mature leaf has            about 11 to 15 leaflets. Size of mature leaves (fourth leaf            from the base of shoot) is about 40 to 52 cm long and about            30 to 35 cm wide. Leaflets are falcate in shape. Fourth            leaflet on the fourth leaf is about 3 to 4 cm wide and about            14 to 16 cm long. The petiole on the fourth leaflet of the            fourth leaf is about 3 mm long and 1.5 mm wide and yellow            green (RHS 144B) in color. Leaf (bud) burst is late,            averaging around April 3 in Tifton Ga. as shown in Table 8.            Time of leaf fall is late Autumn, typically around December            2, but very dependent upon yearly weather.        -   Flower.—‘Ga. 03-6-32’ is protandrous in flowering (type I)            with early season pollen shed and mid to late season            receptivity (FIG. 1 ). It would be pollinated by ‘Avalon’            (U.S. Plant Pat. No. 30,227), ‘McMillan’ (unpatented),            ‘Stuart’ (unpatented), ‘Sumner’ (unpatented), and ‘Zinner’            (unpatented). It would pollinate these same cultivars. The            stigma is medium in size, upright with moderately large            lobes, and yellow green (RHS 154A) with an orange-red blush            (RHS 31B) in color (FIG. 2 ). The stigma is typically about            4.8 mm long and about 2.5 mm wide. The stigma is moderately            splitting. Pigment of the stigma is present, but very light            with weak anthocyanin. Determinate pendulous catkin. Typical            length of catkin is about 92 mm and typical width is about 4            mm.        -   Nut in shuck.—Topography is smooth and shuck texture is            papery. Shuck suture wings are prominent (about 2-3 mm in            height). Shuck color is moderately bright yellow green (RHS            144A). Shuck apex is obtuse. Shucks are not persistent after            nut fall. Typical time of 50% shuck opening is around            October 4 in Tifton, Ga. as given in Table 8. No striping or            ribs are present on the nut shuck.        -   Dry nut.—Nut shells have prominent shell striping which            extends from the apex to the base (FIG. 3 ). Dots are small            (about 0.5 to 2.5 mm diameter), numerous, present from base            to apex, and dark brown in color (RHS200A). Nut shape is            oblong with a cuspidate to mucronate base and an acuminate,            grooved apex. Nuts are round in cross section. Shell            topography is slightly bumpy with ridges from the base to            the apex. Shell thickness is medium and about 0.8-0.9 mm            thick at the equator. Nuts of ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ average about 55            mm in length, about 24 mm in width, with about a 10 mm tip.            Nuts are greyed orange in color (RHS 177B). Kernel size of            the nuts is large. Typical weight of the kernel is 5.8 g.-   Comparisons to other varieties:    -   -   Comparison to parents.—In comparison to ‘Sioux’, ‘Ga.            03-6-32’ has a larger nut. ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ has a typical nut            size of about 10.2 g, while ‘Sioux’ has a typical nut size            of about 6.0 g. In comparison to ‘Desirable’, ‘Ga. 03-6-32’            has a higher percentage kernel. ‘Desirable’ nuts are            normally composed of about 52% kernel while ‘Ga. 03-6-32’            nuts typically have about 56 to 57% kernel. ‘Ga. 03-6-32’            nuts are also a different shape from ‘Desirable’ nuts.            ‘Desirable’ nuts have a round base and oval cross-section            while ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ nuts have a cuspidate to mucronate base            with a round cross sections (FIG. 4 ).        -   Scab resistance.—‘Ga. 03-6-32’ has shown moderate resistance            to pecan scab in replicated tests. Trees were grown in a            sprayed orchard at Tifton in 2012 to 2019, and leaf and nut            scab symptoms were similar to or better than other cultivars            tested (Table 1). In the Ray City sprayed yield trial in            years 2017 to 2019, no scab symptoms were recorded (Table            2). In an unsprayed trial in Tifton, Ga. from 2013 to 2019,            Ga. 03-6-32 had mild leaf scab and moderate nut scab damage            (Table 1). In an Albany, Ga. unsprayed trial, Ga. 03-6-32            also had moderate leaf and nut scab damage. Overall, in            sprayed trial Ga. 03-6-32 has little or no scab infection,            whereas in unsprayed trials Ga. 03-6-32 rates better than            susceptible cultivars like ‘Desirable’ and ‘Pawnee’            (unpatented) and worse than strongly resistant cultivars            like ‘Avalon’ and ‘Elliott’ (unpatented).        -   Production.—To evaluate yield, ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ was topworked            into a bearing orchard at Tifton, Ga. Using this method,            ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ appears to be a good yielding tree with yields            steadily increasing each year, except for year six (Table            5). Yields of whip-grafted trees at Ray City were less than            the high yielding ‘Avalon’, similar to ‘Zinner’ and higher            than the industry standard, ‘Desirable’ (Table 6). Cluster            size of ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ is 2.4, which is similar to other            cultivars with stable bearing habits (‘Desirable’, ‘Stuart’,            and ‘Zinner’) and less than alternating cultivars that need            crop thinning (‘Byrd’, ‘McMillan’, ‘Pawnee’, and ‘Sumner’).            Moderate cluster size and relatively stable yields indicate            that ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ will have a reduced need for crop            thinning.        -   Nut quality.—Nut size (10.2 g) and percent kernel (56.7%)            (Table 7) fall within the range needed for optimum prices in            the current market. Shellers generally want nut size to be            larger than 9 g and more than 52% kernel for shipping to the            Chinese market. ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ has similar size to            ‘Desirable’ and a higher percent kernel (Table 7).            Additionally, ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ has little incidence of packing            material sticking to the kernel and highly attractive            kernels (Table 7).        -   Adaptation.—‘Ga. 03-6-32’ is late to break bud in the spring            (Table 8) which indicates some measure of frost avoidance if            planted in the northern part of Georgia. For many years            ‘Stuart’ was recommended for north Georgia, and budbreak of            ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ is similar to ‘Stuart’. Harvest date is almost            a week ahead of ‘Desirable’ (Table 8) which puts it in the            early mid-season harvest period. This would make ‘Ga.            03-6-32’ among the first cultivars to be harvested, but not            so early that extra protection from predators like crows            would be necessary. ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ has low susceptibility to            black pecan aphid (Melanocallis caryaefoliae) (Tables 1, 2,            3, 4).

TABLE 1 Pest resistance of pecan cultivars and selections in a sprayedorchard over years 2012-2019 at Tifton, Ga. Avg. Max. Black aphidCultivar # Trees Leaf scab^(z) nut scab^(y) nut scab^(x) damage^(w) ‘Ga.03-6-32’ 4 1.3 b^(v) 1.0 d 1.4 d 1.1 de ‘Avalon’ 6 1.0 b 1.0 d 1.0 d 2.1b ‘Byrd’ 5 1.1 b 2.1 b 3.5 b 1.2 cde ‘Desirable’ 6 2.9 a 3.7 a 4.8 a 1.4cd ‘Gafford’ 4 1.0 b 1.0 d 1.0 d 1.0 e ‘Pawnee’ 3 1.1 b 1.4 cd 2.6 c 1.5c ‘Stuart’^(u) 5 1.1 b 1.4 c 3.1 bc 2.5 a ‘Zinner’^(u) 6 1.1 b 1.1 d2.7c 2.6 a Sig. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 ^(z)1 = no scab lesions, 2 =a few isolated lesions with restricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions withexpanding lesions, 4 = stem scab lesions or defoliation. ^(y)1 = no scablesions, 2 = a few lesions with restricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions,0% to 10% coverage, 4 = 11% to 50% coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage ornut drop. Average damage seen on nuts over the tree. ^(x)1 = no scablesions, 2 = a few lesions with restricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions,0% to 10% coverage, 4 = 11% to 50% coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage ornut drop. Maximum damage seen on any nut. ^(w)1 = no damage, 2 = lightchlorotic spotting, 0% to 25% leaves affected, 3 = moderate chloroticspotting, 26% to 75% chlorotic spotting, 4 = heavy chlorotic spotting,76% to 100% leaves affected. ^(v)Mean separation within a column byDuncan's multiple range test, P ≤ 0.05. ^(u)Trees were removed afterhurricane in 2018 and have no data for 2019.

TABLE 2 Pest resistance of pecan cultivars and selections in a sprayedorchard over years 2017-2019 at Ray City, Ga. # Leaf Avg. Max. Blackaphid Cultivar Trees scab^(z) nut scab^(y) nut scab^(x) damage^(w) ‘Ga.03-6-32’ 6 1.0 b^(v) 1.0 b 1.0 c 1.0 b ‘Avalon’ 6 1.0 b 1.0 b 1.0 c 1.9a ‘Desirable’ 6 1.8 a 2.7 a 3.4 a 1.0 b ‘Elliott’ 6 1.0 b 1.0 b 1.0 c1.0 b ‘Zinner’ 6 1.0 b 1.4 b 2.1 b 1.6 a Sig. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001<0.001 ^(z)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a few isolated lesions withrestricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions with expanding lesions, 4 = stemscab lesions or defoliation. ^(y)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a few lesionswith restricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions, 0% to 10% coverage, 4 =11% to 50% coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage or nut drop. Averagedamage seen on nuts over the tree. ^(x)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a fewlesions with restricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions, 0% to 10%coverage, 4 = 11% to 50% coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage or nut drop.Maximum damage seen on any nut. ^(w)1 = no damage, 2 = light chloroticspotting, 0% to 25% leaves affected, 3 = moderate chlorotic spotting,26% to 75% chlorotic spotting, 4 = heavy chlorotic spotting, 76% to 100%leaves affected. ^(v)Mean separation within a column by Duncan'smultiple range test, P ≤ 0.05.

TABLE 3 Pest resistance of pecan cultivars and selections in anunsprayed orchard over years 2013-2019 at Tifton, Ga. # Leaf Avg. Max.Black aphid Cultivar Trees scab^(z) nut scab^(y) nut scab^(x) damage^(w)‘Ga. 03-6-32’ 2 1.9 c^(v) 2.9 c 3.8 b 1.5 d ‘Avalon’ 3 1.0 c 1.0 e 1.2 c2.4 abc ‘Cunard’ 1 3.2 ab 4.8 ab 5.0 a 1.8 bcd ‘Desirable’ 1 3.9 a 5.0 a5.0 a 2.1 bcd ‘Elliott’ 1 1.0 c 1.0 e 1.0 c 1.6 cd ‘McMillan’ 1 1.0 c1.0 e 1.2 c 1.7 cd ‘Pawnee’ 1 2.1 bc 4.8 ab 4.9 a 2.0 bcd ‘Stuart’ 1 2.1bc 4.6 ab 5.0 a 3.1 a ‘Sumner’ 1 1.6 c 2.4 d 3.4 b 2.1 bcd ‘Zinner’ 21.9 c 4.4 b 4.9 a 2.7 ab Sig. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 ^(z)1 = noscab lesions, 2 = a few isolated lesions with restricted growth, 3 =multiple lesions with expanding lesions, 4 = stem scab lesions ordefoliation. ^(y)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a few lesions with restrictedgrowth, 3 = multiple lesions, 0% to 10% coverage, 4 = 11% to 50%coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage or nut drop. Average damage seen onnuts over the tree. ^(x)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a few lesions withrestricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions, 0% to 10% coverage, 4 = 11% to50% coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage or nut drop. Maximum damage seenon any nut. ^(w)1 = no damage, 2 = light chlorotic spotting, 0% to 25%leaves affected, 3 = moderate chlorotic spotting, 26% to 75% chloroticspotting, 4 = heavy chlorotic spotting, 76% to 100% leaves affected.^(v)Mean separation within a column by Duncan's multiple range test, P ≤0.05. Years were treated as reps.

TABLE 4 Pest resistance of pecan cultivars and selections in anunsprayed orchard over years 2016-2019 at Albany, Ga. Leaf Avg. Max.Black aphid Cultivar # Trees scab^(z) nut scab^(y) nut scab^(x)damage^(w) ‘Ga. 3-6-32’ 3 1.4 b^(v) 2.2 b 3.8 b 1.9 ‘Avalon’ 3 1.0 c 1.0c 1.0 c 2.5 ‘Cunard’ 2 4.0 a 5.0 a 5.0 a 2.0 ‘Desirable’ 3 3.9 a 5.0 a5.0 a 2.0 ‘Elliott’ 3 1.0 c 1.0 c 1.0 c 2.3 ‘Sumner’ 3 1.0 c 2.0 bc 3.9b 2.1 ‘Treadwell’ 2 4.0 a 5.0 a 5.0 a 1.6 Sig. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 NS^(z)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a few isolated lesions with restrictedgrowth, 3 = multiple lesions with expanding lesions, 4 = stem scablesions or defoliation. ^(y)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a few lesions withrestricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions, 0% to 10% coverage, 4 = 11% to50% coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage or nut drop. Average damage seenon nuts over the tree. ^(x)1 = no scab lesions, 2 = a few lesions withrestricted growth, 3 = multiple lesions, 0% to 10% coverage, 4 = 11% to50% coverage, 5 = 51% to 100% coverage or nut drop. Maximum damage seenon any nut. ^(w)1 = no damage, 2 = light chlorotic spotting, 0% to 25%leaves affected, 3 = moderate chlorotic spotting, 26% to 75% chloroticspotting, 4 = heavy chlorotic spotting, 76% to 100% leaves affected.^(v)Mean separation within a column by Duncan's multiple range test, P ≤0.05.

TABLE 5 In-shell nut yield (lbs. per tree) of pecan cultivars in Tifton,Ga. for years 10-14 (2015-2019) from planting. # Year Year Year YearYear Cultivar Trees 10 11 12 13 14 Avg. ‘Ga. 3-6-32’^(z) 4 72 b^(y) 4876 85 ab 98 ab 76 ab ‘Avalon’^(z) 6 69 b 85 75 111 a 125 a 93 a ‘Byrd’ 595 a 60 53 69 b 50 c 66 bc ‘Desirable’ 4 37 c 50 50 52 b 40 c 46 c‘Gafford’ 4 63 b 67 76 85 ab —^(x) 73 abc ‘Pawnee’ 3 12 c 83 70 54 b 62bc 56 bc Sig. <0.001 NS NS 0.03 0.009 0.014 ^(z)Ga. 03-6-32 and Avalonwere topworked into the orchard and when yields were similar to year 7yields they were considered to be 7 years old. ^(y)Mean separationwithin a column by Duncan's multiple range test, P ≤ 0.05. ^(x)Gaffordyields were lost in 2018 (year 14) because it could not be harvestedahead of hurricane damage.

TABLE 6 In-shell nut yield (lbs. per tree) of pecan cultivars in RayCity, Ga. for years 6-8 from planting (2017-2019). Yield Yield YieldYield Cultivar # Trees year 6 year 7 year 8 avg. ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ 4 28a^(z) 26 b 49 a 34 b ‘Avalon’ 3 35 a 57 a 68 a 53 a ‘Desirable’ 4 10 b 9 c 19 b 13 c ‘Zinner’ 4 13 b 40 ab 44 a 32 b Sig. <0.001 <0.001 0.010.002 ^(z)Mean separation within a column by Duncan's multiple rangetest, P ≤ 0.05.

TABLE 7 Nut and kernel quality attributes of pecan cultivars averagedover all years of testing (2009-2019) at Tifton, Ga. # Percent PercentKernel Cultivar Trees Nuts/lb kernel fuzz^(z) rating^(y) ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ 444.4 d^(x) 56.7 a   0 c 4.9 a ‘Avalon’ 6 47.2 bc 53.8 b   0 c 4.6 a‘Byrd’ 5 49.8 a 56.5 a 1.5 b 3.9 b ‘Desirable’ 4 45.3 cd 48.4 d 4.6 a3.0 c ‘Gafford’ 4 49.2 ab 50.4 c 3.5 a 3.5 b ‘Pawnee’ 3 47.1 bc 56.0 a  0 c 3.8 b Sig. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 ^(z)Estimated percentage ofthe kernel surface covered with packing material. ^(y)Attractivenessrating of the pecan kernels with 5 = Excellent, 4 = Good, 3 = Average, 2= Poor, 1 = Terrible. Ratings are based on kernel color, size, fill,shelling ability, and lack of defects. ^(x)Mean separation within acolumn by Duncan's multiple range test, P ≤ 0.05.

TABLE 8 Phenology & number of nuts/cluster of pecan cultivars in Tifton,Ga., 2011-2015. Bud burst # Nuts per 50% Shuck Cultivar # Trees datecluster split ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ 4  3-Apr ab^(z) 2.4 b  4-Oct b ‘Avalon’ 6 4-Apr ab 2.4 b  2-Oct b ‘Byrd’ 5 25-Mar c 3.2 a 19-Sep c ‘Desirable’ 431-Mar b 2.3 b 10-Oct a ‘Stuart’ 5  3-Apr a 2.6 b 11-Oct a ‘Pawnee’ 331-Mar b 3.4 a 10-Sep d Sig. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 ^(z)Mean separationwithin a column by Duncan's multiple range test, P ≤ 0.05.The ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ pecan tree is therefore an improved new and distinctpecan.

I claim:
 1. A new and distinct cultivar of pecan tree of Caryaillinoinensis named ‘Ga. 03-6-32’ substantially as herein illustratedand described.